Episode 2: 

Campus level trends

Same charts, different story:
opportunity by campus

Opportunity in Hawaiʻi isn’t evenly distributed — geography matters. Where a student goes to school — and what programs are available on that campus — can significantly shape their economic trajectory after graduation.

To stay aligned with the original data used to calculate Hawaiʻi’s nation-leading underemployment rate, we’re focusing here on four-year degrees only. And while there are four UH campuses that grant four-year degrees — UH Mānoa, UH West Oʻahu, UH Hilo, and UH Maui College — only three of them (Mānoa, West Oʻahu, and Hilo) had sufficient five-year and ten-year longitudinal wage and retention data available in both the DXP and PSEO data sets used for this episode.  For campus level data, county level living wage thresholds are used for each campus (Honolulu County living wage is used for UH- Manoa and UH- West Oʻahu, and Hawaiʻi County living wage is used for UH - Hilo).

Note: While this episode focuses on outcomes for four-year degree programs across the UH system, the same data sources contain valuable insights about students who pursue certificate and associate degrees — especially within Hawaiʻi’s Community College system. To explore those pathways — and how opportunity varies by county — check out the County Data Deep Dive, where we surface local-level trends and questions rooted in two-year and short-term credential outcomes.


Students don’t just choose a major, they choose a campus. Which campus a student chooses often is informed by logistical constraints such as access to housing and travel time as much or more so as academic or career considerations. Campuses don’t just offer programs, they offer access. And not all programs are available in all places. This section is guided by the following core questions:

  • Do some campuses offer more programs that lead to living wage jobs?

  • Are certain campuses better at keeping graduates rooted in Hawaiʻi?

  • How does the scale of programs — or the availability of certain high-opportunity pathways — differ across institutions?

CAMPUS Level Guiding questions

This first visualization in the section reuses the same structure as the Wages vs. Staying Power chart from the System Level — but now the chart is filtered by campus, allowing us to explore outcomes at UH Mānoa, UH West Oʻahu, and UH Hilo individually. This lens helps us see not only what programs are leading to good jobs, but whether those jobs are retaining graduates in Hawaiʻi — and how those patterns shift across campuses and over time.

1. What’s happening on individual campuses?

This visualization builds on the earlier statewide analysis by diving deeper into specific high-wage programs at each UH campus. Using self-reported wage data from the UH Graduate Degree Pathways dashboard, we explore: Which four-year degrees meet or exceed the county-level living wage within five years of graduation?

This chart offers a clear, year-by-year view of wage growth — helping learners and policymakers alike see not just which degrees pay well eventually, but how quickly they reach family-sustaining levels of income.

2. By campus - Which degrees lead to a living wage within 5 years?

3. By campus - Which programs keep students in hawaiʻi?

In this visualization, we turn our attention from wages to staying power — examining which four-year degree programs are most likely to keep graduates living in Hawaiʻi five and ten years after earning their degree. We answer the question: “By campus, which degree programs have the highest rates of graduates still living in Hawaiʻi after five and ten years?”

Understanding which programs are most likely to keep people in Hawaiʻi helps us move beyond just what pays well to consider what fulfills deeply. In a state where community, culture, and connection often shape career decisions as much as salary does, this kind of data can better inform students, institutions, and policymakers about pathways that support local thriving.

4. By campus - Which programs see more graduates Leave Hawaiʻi?

Not every degree leads to local opportunity. This visualization flips the lens to examine which four-year degree programs see the lowest percentages of graduates still living in Hawaiʻi five and ten years after completing their degrees. We answer the question: “By campus, which programs are most likely to lead students away from Hawaiʻi?”

While it’s tempting to assume this is only about low wages, the story is likely more complex. Sometimes, graduates leave because the job market isn’t strong enough in their field. Other times, it’s because the degree itself prepares them for careers with national (or international) demand, often pulling them away from local opportunities.

5A. By campus - the opportunity matrix

 This visualization maps median wage five years after graduation (x-axis) against the percent of graduates still living in Hawaiʻi (y-axis), by individual campus. The result is a localized picture of what opportunity looks like — and how it varies based on where a student earns their degree. This visualization raises the following questions:

  • Are some campuses underserved in access to high-wage programs — and if so, what would it take to change that?

  • Could high-wage, low-retention programs benefit from stronger local employer partnerships or sector strategies?

  • Are low-wage, high-retention programs asking too much of their graduates — to sacrifice economic security for mission or place?

  • What investments (e.g., wraparound supports, wage subsidies, employer engagement) would help shift more dots into the top-right quadrant?

5B. matrix category by campus

Which UH campuses are producing the most graduates into good jobs — and who’s being left behind?

The Opportunity Matrix shows us which programs lead to high wages and high retention in Hawaiʻi. But this next visualization zooms out to show the distribution of outcomes across entire campuses - What share of each campus’s graduates fall into each of these zones five years after graduation?

The data reveals that no campus is yet positioned to deliver equitable, high-wage, place-rooted outcomes at scale.

  • UH Mānoa offers the strongest share of high-opportunity programs — but also has deep disparities.

  • UH Hilo reveals potential gaps between available programs and high-opportunity local jobs.

  • UH West Oʻahu keeps students rooted — but its degree offerings are concentrated in low-wage fields..

So what can be done? Should we scale the programs that fall in the top-right quadrant — especially at Mānoa? Could new programs or sector investments shift more West Oʻahu and Hilo graduates into higher wage brackets? What kinds of wraparound supports — from wage subsidies to mentorship pipelines — would retain more grads in high-demand, low-retention fields?

5C. wages + staying power by matrix category + campus

What can we learn when we look at earnings and place-staying power side by side? This side-by-side breakdown helps reinforce why we need nuanced, place-based strategies — and why the statewide Generational Workforce Commitment will need to support very different pathways and sector strategies on each island.

  • Retention is not just about wages — mission-driven careers and community roots matter.

  • But job quality still matters — especially when we see values-aligned grads struggling to make ends meet.

  • Each campus plays a different role in Hawaiʻi’s workforce system — and will likely need different kinds of investments to unlock more equitable, high-opportunity outcomes.

roots to canopy:
Explore the Full Data set and analysis

Data and insights across the whole UH system.
A holistic view of what’s happening statewide with respect to degree payoff and job opportunity over time, across sectors.

Episode 2: Understanding Underemployment
Get the context and overview of education, degree, and workforce outcomes in Hawaiʻi.

What we learned and where the data points towards further inquiry.
Signals and questions that can inform policy, research, and data strategy moving forward.

How We Did the Digging

Learn more about our process, sources, and assumptions for Episode 2.